Horizontal Navigation Bar w/Rollover Effect


GOP names Argall as candidate for Senate seat…


GOP names Argall as candidate for Senate seat…

TOTALS FROM 5 ROUNDS OF BALLOTING…


Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful).
2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story).
3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults).
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable.
Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting.
***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else***

NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

10 Comments

  1. The Troll
    Posted December 20, 2008 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Oh Shit.

  2. Billy Jack
    Posted December 20, 2008 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    It simply never ends does it, Troll?

  3. ReformNow
    Posted December 20, 2008 at 6:02 pm | Permalink

    Gretchen – why? Why would we be better off with Argall in the Senate? Reform minded Republicans need to help elect the Dem candidate.

  4. Greg Yoest
    Posted December 20, 2008 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

    Very interesting looking at the vote totals between the 2nd & 3rd rounds, and the 4th and 5th as well. Don’t have time to explain the oddity here, just look at the balloting…and someone please explain to me how the 3rd ballot happened w/ the candidates who were on it after the results of the 2nd one came in; ditto the 5th ballot vis-a-vis the 4th. Hmmm, what was up with that?????

    Now, I know Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem as well as just about anyone, but, I’m really not sure what was going on there between those respective rounds of balloting!!!!!

    ??????

  5. Card Carrying PSEA
    Posted December 20, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    The existence of third, fourth and fifth candidates etc. is designed to split conservative or reform votes to enable the insider to win in the end.

    In an “open primary” the candidates split votes up to enable the insider to win.

    This process had to be more closely managed so that Argall could come out on top on the last ballot.

  6. The Mushroom
    Posted December 21, 2008 at 8:00 am | Permalink

    Now they want to send one of the Payjacking ringleaders to the Senate.

    Hack, Cough, Hack.

  7. Stallone Ranger
    Posted December 21, 2008 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Gretchen Sterns didn’t win? Awwwwwwwwww. I thought she was one of the great rising stars of the “conservative movement” in Pennsylvania. I guess there are only two problems with that wishful thinking, she got very few votes from those who know her best, and she wants to be part of the Republican establishment that the “conservative movement” hates so much.

    Despite being on the Executive Committee of the Schuylkill County Republican Committee, she received only 6 votes on the first ballot. Much like Russ Diamond, it seems that Gretchen Sterns can’t get close to enough votes from those who know her best.

    When asked how she would raise the money necessary to compete, Gretchen Sterns didn’t mention YCOP, Bob Guzzardi, or the “conservative movement.” Instead, PolitickerPA.com reports that “Pottsville lawyer Gretchen Sterns said the state Republican Party would help supplement her war chest.” Isn’t the PA GOP the enemy of YCOP, Bob Guzzardi, and the “conservative movement”?

    It must be disappointing for the “conservative movement” to deal with yet another failure. I guess you have to add it to the list with Pat Toomey, Russ Diamond, and so many others. So much for the “conservative movement” getting a foot-hold in Pennsylvania, especially when it can’t even get a foothold within the state’s minority party.

  8. Posted December 22, 2008 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    You’re huffing and puffing about a secret ballot run by insiders?

    Too bad this wasn’t opened to the public to decide. Then we would see if your claims had any merit.

    By the way…when will we see your name on a ballot? Or are you happy with the puppy dog role, following others around and letting them do the hard work?

  9. RendellPowerTit
    Posted December 22, 2008 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    yea thats a great idea, hand this seats to a dem and we will never get it back, there are to many union, and people demanding handouts in this district to assume that a republican can win this back if a dem takes it.

  10. Posted December 25, 2008 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    I heart you too, Stallone.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*




***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***

***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***

***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***

***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***

.

Horizontal Navigation Bar w/Rollover Effect