Rendell: Turzai’s tax-cut plan ‘ludicrous’, says Mike ‘must be nuts’…
GOP RESPONSE: Increasing Spending and Creating New Programs This Year Is ‘Ludicrous’…
Rendell: Turzai’s tax-cut plan ‘ludicrous’, says Mike ‘must be nuts’…
|
Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful). 2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story). 3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults). |
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting. ***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else*** |
NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
|
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies |
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog |
***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***
***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***
***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***
***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***
.
6 Comments
Good for you Mike. Stand your ground.
Kennedy, Reagan, and Bush (43) all cut taxes and revenues increased.
If cutting taxes makes Mike 'nuts', not knowing this basic concept of economics makes Rendell stupid or just plain malicious.
For Democrats, the overriding concern is to provide funding for friends. That funding can only come from those who have assets.
It comes as a never-ending surprise that they will tell lies, from Global Warming to Obesity Dangers to schools that they, themselves, have destroyed in order to justify what those who believe in private property properly believe to be theft.
We have to ask God to give leftists the grace to be repelled by spending their lives bearing false witness.
Rendell is just plain stupid. It's that simple. These are the clowns that endlessly promote government spending and more welfare for everyone because the economy is in the tank and nobody has any money to buy stuff. They seem to forget the no money part when it comes to funding all these programs that we apparently need. I don't know about you, but I have not received one red cent even though my income is going down and my taxes going up.
I don't care if Spendell thinks the benefit is only 20 bucks. That's 20 bucks more than I had before and 20 bucks he can't use to line his pal's pockets
Isn't this the same blowhard Governor who accused Folmer of being "certifiable"? Why doesn't somebody just call this fat slob out once and for all?
While tax cuts do spur economic growth and do eventually lead to increased tax revenues, the problem for state government is in the cash flow. As you know, the state must balance its budget. As such, cutting taxes will lead to additional revenue short-falls in the near term – something our constitution does not allow. The real goal should be to not raise taxes (first, do not harm) and cut spending to meet current revenues.
Yet a tax cut now, with corresponding spending cuts, would speed up and economic resurgence within the state. There's no reason the two could not happen at once.