PA Public pensions more lucrative than private…
|
Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful). 2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story). 3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults). |
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting. ***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else*** |
NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
|
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies |
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog |
***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***
***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***
***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***
***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***
.
4 Comments
Ticking time bomb is right. This generational wealth transfer needs to stop.
"PA Public pensions more lucrative than private"
Shazam! Who knoew? Of course, the article title implies there are private pensions. Wrong.
The pension system in this state for school employees is a crime.
IN 2001 I got a 25 percent jackup in my pension for a 20 percent increase in my contribution.
Guess who picks up the tab for all the rest????????
The taxpayers must demand a rollback in pension benefits immediately.
The system is stacked against the taxpayer. As long as judges have pensions, no others' pensions may be reduced. As the value of real estate continues to drop, largely because buying real estate makes you a slave of the teacher's pension fund, the problem will get worse.
Democracy strangles itself.