Horizontal Navigation Bar w/Rollover Effect


Altmire & Holden lone Dem votes against health care bill…


Altmire & Holden lone Dem votes against health care bill…


Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful).
2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story).
3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults).
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable.
Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting.
***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else***

NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

24 Comments

  1. CARDCARRYPSEA
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 5:35 am | Permalink

    Dahlkemper is in a liberal enough district.

    Holden and Altmire both judged their vulnerablility.

    Holden has a district with deep talk radio penetration (WHP).

    But can both of these guys separate themselves from Obama and win next year??????

  2. Posted November 8, 2009 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Hopefully, there will be alot of new reps in 2010. Ones with ears who listen to their constituents.

  3. Viva Novak
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    So the PA Blue Dogs helped ObamaCare through the House. The vote was 220-115, so without their help it doesn't go through. Holden is toast. Carney is toast. Murtha and Kanjo could be vulnerable.

  4. northpennresident
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Holden, no doubt was given "cover" by the Speaker when it became evident she had the votes. A pathetic performance by Republicans who gave cover on the abortion, thereby clearing the way to pass.

  5. Fearless Freep
    Posted November 8, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Altmire is a lap dog, not a blue dog. Pelosi plays him like a Stradivarius.

  6. Posted November 8, 2009 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Freep’s right. Dems knew exactly who to ‘cover’. You say they’re toast? Then get quality candidates fast.

  7. Posted November 8, 2009 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    The only reason Holden may retain his seat is because the GOP leadership in Berks, Lebanon, Schuylkill, Dauphin and Cumberland counties are inept morons.

  8. Posted November 8, 2009 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    There was also one Republican from Louisiana who voted for this miscarriage of law – Joe Cao. If the House GOP endorses him for re-election, they should all be tossed out on their ears.

  9. Posted November 8, 2009 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Holden was getting pounded by his constituents – the same ones he blew off by failing to appear at town hall meetings this summer.

    Despite this vote, I think he is going to be in trouble – presuming the the GOP chairman have the intestinal fortitude to challenge him.

  10. Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    Joe Cao won a special election in the bluest of districts a year ago in New Orleans. He replaced the now convicted congressmen William Jefferson, Democrat-Louisana. He was the last GOPer to vote last night, and had premission form Boehner to vote yea once the count got over 218 in favor. If he wants to win reelection in his district in 2010, he needed to vote for it as a tactical decision.

    Also, based on what I am reading, the bill is DOA in the Senate as many moderate Ds will not vote for cloture. Liberman, Landreau, Lincoln, and Nelson are among those who are not in favor of a public option.

    If the bill does not get to conference by February 2010, then there will be no bill at all since those up Ds for reelection in the House and Senate do not want to give the voting public another reason to vote them out.

  11. Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    Delusional if you think Murtha's vulnerable. Most of Murtha's constituents are already on government healthcare through Medicare, Medicaid or SCHIP. You must remember it is also the most favorable to big spending of any district.

  12. Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    Let's not make excuses for weasels, okay?

  13. Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Carney, Dahlkemper and Patrick Murphy are the most vulnerable because of their vote.

    Murtha and Kanjorski are not vulnerable because their districts love big government anyhow. A majority of Murtha's district is already on government healthcare through Medicare, Medicaid or SCHIP. Anyone who thinks these districts are bastions of limited government just waiting to be awakened should visit their nearest mental health professional because they clearly have lost it.

  14. Posted November 9, 2009 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    The fact we have any Republican votes from that district is a miracle. His district is about as Democratic as Brady's district.

  15. Posted November 8, 2009 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Murphy’s the most vulnerable, by far. So, who’s running against him?

  16. dave
    Posted November 9, 2009 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    There are zip, reasons as to why no top tier republicans have announced against Carney and Dahlkemper,

    Carney even voted for cap and trade. Some top republicans in that district better announce stat now. Any names anyone hear? I honestly think Carney showed his arrogance in this vote he really feels like he can win re-election easily and still vote for all of Pelosi legislation

    Carney, Dahlkemper and perhaps to lesser extent Altmire are all vulnerable. We can win all 3 seats.

    Murphy should not be given a free ride and while Murtha is entrenched in his district you never know how things may play out with his ethics problems.

  17. Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    So, compromising one's principles is justified if the district is Marxist?

    Gee, where have I heard that before….?

  18. Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    I received a fundraising letter from the guy who ran against him last time, so I guess he's in the race.

  19. Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    With the tide rising against incumbents, there is no excuse for the GOP not to have a challenger for ever Democrat in the state.

  20. dave
    Posted November 9, 2009 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    whatever happened to Fitzpatrick?

    someone said he was sick? any news

  21. Posted November 9, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    This is not even a swing district or a marginally Democrat district.

    In the end, a representative has to represent the wishes of their constituents.

  22. Posted November 9, 2009 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Doesn't mean he has to be on our team.

  23. Posted November 9, 2009 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    The nature of our system, a two party system, places many candidates in both parties that have many disagreements with them.

    Cao's voting record generally places him on the Republican side. He voted against the stimulus and cap and trade. That is two important votes we would not have had if a Democrat represented the district.

    I would be more than willing to throw someone under the bus if they voted for it in a safe or swing district.

    In the end, he will be gone in 2010 anyway. If he gets reelected in such a Democratic district, he is on to something.

  24. Posted November 9, 2009 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    And, as far as I am concerned, he should go. I would hate to think that the GOP would waste time and money on this closet commie.

Post a Comment

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*




***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***

***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***

***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***

***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***

.

Horizontal Navigation Bar w/Rollover Effect