PA Supreme Court ex-justice named Penn State counsel…
|
Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful). 2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story). 3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults). |
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting. ***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else*** |
NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
|
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies |
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog |
***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***
***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***
***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***
***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***
.
4 Comments
Wonder what the salary is? Pension? Is there a bonus for a Supreme Court ex-justice white-washing Michael Mann and mann-made Global Warming? For helping to sweep "hide the decline" under the rug? Pretending that Penn State research is on the up-andup? Solemnly concluding that "Michael Mann may have made a few minor mistakes that do not rise to the level of prosecutable, or even intentional, fraud"?
Anyone want to make a bet that some variant of that last sentence isn't part of the final "conclusion"?
Between our taxes and the tuition, Penn State takes in a lot of money.
Shouldn't they be more responsible in their spending. Bureaucracy needs to be cut in education, not increased.
Frankly, Spanier and other top administration at PSU should be taking a ten percent pay cut now.
His salary should eventually be capped down around maybe 400-thousand. He's paid over a half million now.
Penn State is a business hiding under the "education chairty" label…their multiple failed business ventures are the reason their costs aare so high…as well as their bias against intellectual diversity…for example, when they did the search for a counsel, they insisted that the person be a woman or a minority going in….bias, prejudice, sucking off the taxpayer's nipple…THEY ARE PENN STATE
She authored one of the worst most pro drug dealer search and seizure opinions in years , the Dunlap case , where she was joined by two RINOs ( Saylor and Fitzgerald ) during her short but disastrous tenure on the Pa. Supreme Court . In a Thompson case , her poorly reasoned handiwork was over-ruled in an opinion authored by then Justice Jane Greenspan ( who is a DINO not a RINO ) , the Thompson case . Justice Castille's concurring opinion, joined by Justices Eakin and McCaffery , took Baldwin's muddled opinion apart in blistering fashion . The Peter Principle lives on.
I hope she has better law clerks at Penn State !