Sestak needs to make Specter’s age and medical condition an issue?…
Sestak needs to make Specter’s age and medical condition an issue?…
|
Comment Commandments:
1) No Personal Attacks. (Debating is encouraged, but be respectful). 2) No Sexual Discussion (unless it specifically pertains to a cited story). 3) No Profanity (Let’s all behave like adults). |
GOLDEN RULE:
Be civil and statesmanlike. You can disagree without being disagreeable. Annoying trolls who break these rules will be blocked from commenting. ***Please don't disable anonymous commenting for everyone else*** |
NOTE TO COMMENTERS: CREATE AN INTENSE DEBATE ACCOUNT
|
-vote comments up or down
-email notifications when someone replies |
-pick a profile picture
-promote your website or blog |
***TOPIC FORUM: 50 STORIES LAST COMMENTED ON***
***LIST OF TOP 50 COMMENTERS***
***LIST OF 50 MOST COMMENTED ON STORIES***
***LIST OF 50 LAST COMMENTS***
.
20 Comments
Written in a way that Sestak can maintain "plausible deniability".
Specter is loosing it.
And apparently, so is Sestak. I sincerely hope Pennsylvanians do the right thing in November.
From the article:
"Of course, there’s always the risk that a lame-duck Specter could revert to his Republican roots between the May primary and January of 2011, but that’s relatively small compared to the damage six years of a far-right, ultraconservative activist like Pat Toomey would do."
LOL times 2.
1] Specter = Republican roots? That's a laugh. He was always a democrat even while playing for team GOP.
2] What far right ultra conservative votes (or would) to confirm Sotomayor?; and downplays the significance of being pro life?; and cannot articulate the meaning of the 2nd Amendment?
Maybe Sestak really did not have any input into this article but now I am wondering if Toomey did. /sarcasm
For the love of Pete, will you stop asking those difficult questions? /sarc
Uh, no.
LOL
From the article:
"Of course, there’s always the risk that a lame-duck Specter could revert to his Republican roots between the May primary and January of 2011, but that’s relatively small compared to the damage six years of a far-right, ultraconservative activist like Pat Toomey would do."
LOL times 2.
1] Specter = Republican roots? That's a laugh. He was always a democrat even while playing for team GOP.
2] What far right ultra conservative votes (or would) to confirm Sotomayor?; and downplays the significance of being pro life?; and cannot articulate the meaning of the 2nd Amendment?
Maybe Sestak really did not have any input into this article but now I am wondering if Toomey did. /sarcasm
Expect an article by a "friend" of Specter highlighting Sestak's firing from the Navy; and his verbal abuse of his young staff.
Specter continues to make his age and temperment an issue. Meanwhile, Sestak proves his absence of personality daily.
If I were Sestak, all I would do is run commercials that feature Specter in his most inept and incoherent moments, and then end the spot with one question: "Isn't it time for a change?"
unfortunately sestak needs to tread carefully – he needs a Washington job with the Obama team after his loss. Bashing Specter is only going to make that job search more difficult.
Then Sestak should not have picked a fight he couldn't win.
"Now wait a minute. Now wait a minute." "I'll treat you like a lady if you act like a lady."
Sestak now is planning on being on the ballot for the Senate as well as his U.S. House seat.
"There was this single bullet…"
For real?
That is the rumor among many Democrats. I should have caveated that it is a rumor and we won't know for sure until he announces (one way or the other) or files in approximately one month.
I KNOW Rep. Chris van Hollen and DCCC, as well as Sen. Schumer, Sen. Menendez and DSCC have been trying to get him to drop the Senate campaign for some time (for different reasons), and Rep. Nancy Pelosi spoke with him last weekend about it. Apparently, it is a position he is considering in light of his worse-than-he-expected showing at the Democratic State Committee endorsement vote last weekend. I haven't spoken to Rep. Sestak personally, but according to others I have spoken to who are close to him, he hasn't made up his mind yet, but that is a possibility.
Very interesting, Ranger. Keep us apprised.
But "No Show Joe" may have burned his bridges in PA-7.
[youtube 0tqW9Kj8DVU&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tqW9Kj8DVU&fe... youtube]
Looks like he is just running for Senate:
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/Sestak...
Heads up Stallone…if you create an IntenseDebate account (http://intensedebate.com/register.php) you get email notifications when someone replies to your email. You and the others on here have fun back and forth conversations. I think you would really enjoy this site more with it!